NFT API returning 0 NFTs

Moralis General
#1

hey team! I have a nft contract on mumbai testnet. I’m using moralis to get owners of the nft. its an ERC1155. the method I’m mainly interested is getNFTsForContract as documented here. I am specifying options as

const options = {
  chain: "mumbai",
  address: "0x9c138706fa85b85b86e1b7e97182501fccf8e82e",
  token_address: "0x099Fb655a7bb4df994243acb1A0B5a28d9ca2924",
}

It returning me no NFTs. however as proof I am attaching screenshots the the address infact has the nfts.

screenshot: proof that address holds nft (token id 25 for example)

image
image744×583 31.8 KB

you can verify yourself on mumbai explorer as well

please help and thanks in advance!

1 Like
#2

it looks like this works:

x = await Moralis.Web3API.account.getNFTsForContract({
  chain: "mumbai",
  address: "0x9510a5cbde44227c00cf36ff5d2f8b6b72ddcd55",
  token_address: "0x099Fb655a7bb4df994243acb1A0B5a28d9ca2924",
})

it looks like the other NFTs are not indexed yet

this also seems to work:

x = await Moralis.Web3API.account.getNFTsForContract({
  chain: "mumbai",
  address: "0x74a3c8511e709b6463adeed6ec1b273886cefc13",
  token_address: "0x099Fb655a7bb4df994243acb1A0B5a28d9ca2924",
})
1 Like
#3

yeah those accounts work. those are my test accounts as well.

  • what’s the solution for this or maybe more accounts not being tracked?
#4

We will have to investigate why those particular NFTs don’t show

#5

it should be fixed now

#6

This doesn’t work for me querying for my NFT, returns empty page…

const x = await Moralis.Web3API.account.getNFTsForContract({
chain: “mumbai”,
address: “0x849a9B1d122b8E417D4442fAdb389acdBE29Df6d”,
token_address: “0x849a9B1d122b8E417D4442fAdb389acdBE29Df6d”,
})

#7

try this:

t = await Moralis.Web3API.account.getNFTsForContract({
chain: "mumbai",
address: "0xe8f9a288554faabbaca8c6946bf2e3a07b685c12",
token_address: "0x849a9B1d122b8E417D4442fAdb389acdBE29Df6d",
})

in that example the address is the same as token_address, it is not going to work that way

#8

“address” is not a good name here. probably “owner_of” would be better as that’s what it’s called in the response