would this form be better?
-
address
(optional, when authenticated with MetaMask): A user address (i.e.0x1a2b3x...
). If specified, the user attached to the query is ignored and the address will be used instead. -
to_block
(optional): The block number on which the balances should be checked. -
address
(required, when not authenticated with MetaMask): The address for which the native balance will be checked.
Hmm, itβs not clear to me yet, when authenticated with MetaMask? :S
When user is authenticated then it tries to use current user address if no address is provided.
Then I guess the simplest approach would be to make it required no matter what. I guess you meant authenticated with Wallet and not MetaMask for the use case when authenticated with only e-mail. I would do it always required then the dev must not think about the differences, etc.